[Jool-list] [NAT64(jool) with tunnel concept in network

Kunal Chauhan atkunalchauhan at gmail.com
Tue May 19 11:15:04 CDT 2020


Alberto,

I might have not able to expalin properly.
I will work out then , proceed for further questions.

On 19 May 2020 9:39 p.m., "Alberto Leiva" <ydahhrk at gmail.com> wrote:

Kunal:

I have zero experience with tunnels, but even if I did,I don't think
it's reasonable to expect us to help you with that.
You don't seem to be running into any issues; it's more like you're
expecting us to do your job.

You don't seem to need Jool for anything in the first place, since you
don't have any IPv6 nodes.
But even if you did, Jool is a layer 3-4 hybrid forwarder. You can't
have the same network (172.x.x.x) in both sides of it.

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 7:03 AM Kunal Chauhan <atkunalchauhan at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> Hi Team,
>
> Below is the case I want to try with jool
> NODE A ---------->JOOL -----------------------SECURITY-TUNNEL---> NODE B
> 172.x.x.x              172.x.x.x                   (172.x.x.x)
intermediate        104.x.x.x
>                                                                    nodes
> But need some clue
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail-lists.nic.mx/pipermail/jool-list/attachments/20200519/da73396a/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Jool-list mailing list