[Jool-list] Where are jool's sessions saved?

[Alberto Leiva]

Oh, by the way: I'm currently working on a complete rewrite of the
Netlink code internals to patch issue #322. The API should not be
affected, but you might want to wait until Jool 4.0.8 just to be sure.

On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 11:13 AM Alberto Leiva <ydahhrk at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Where are jool's sessions saved?
>
> Nowhere, presently. They are kept in the RAM.
>
> > would it be of interest
> > to integrate jool's session support into our new daemon?
>
> Well, Jool presently pushes sessions to anyone listening on its
> Generic Netlink family if the `ss-enabled` global is true.
> And a daemon can similarly get the full table by performing the same
> Netlink request `jool session display` does under the hood.
>
> You can get access to these functions by importing Jool's Netlink
> library (https://github.com/NICMx/Jool/tree/master/src/usr/nl).
> Though, if you're using Debian, is presently exported privately into
> the package. But this could be upgraded with some work, and I don't
> see any objections for doing this.
>
> Here's the sample usage for querying the whole table:
>
> - Initialization:
> https://github.com/NICMx/Jool/blob/master/src/usr/argp/wargp/session.c#L112-L114
> - Request: https://github.com/NICMx/Jool/blob/master/src/usr/argp/wargp/session.c#L127-L128
> (You want to do this three times if you want all three protocols.)
> - Response handler:
> https://github.com/NICMx/Jool/blob/master/src/usr/argp/wargp/session.c#L55-L100
>
> Am I answering your question?
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 10:54 AM Nico Schottelius
> <nico.schottelius at ungleich.ch> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Good morning list,
> >
> > we at ungleich are currently looking into writing a replacement for
> > conntrackd that works in IPv6 only environments.
> >
> > The basic concept is "get sessions, multicast them, from time to time
> > multicast the whole session table" - which plus/minus should be able to
> > create a multi master setup in the end.
> >
> > My question and reason why I post this here is: would it be of interest
> > to integrate jool's session support into our new daemon? From my point
> > of view jool's session entries are very similar in nature and thus we
> > could implement this as well - or even use joold as a basis.
> >
> > Looking forward to what you think about this.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Nico
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Modern, affordable, Swiss Virtual Machines. Visit www.datacenterlight.ch
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jool-list mailing list
> > Jool-list at nic.mx
> > https://mail-lists.nic.mx/listas/listinfo/jool-list